FC Bayern Forum

Interesting.

Can't see tweet? Click here!

When Uli Hoeneß was sentenced to imprisonment in 2014 due to tax evasion, the relationship with Rummenigge fell into disrepair [sportbild]
During Hoeneß' stay in prison, Rummenigge led the business alone and the feeling grew within the club that Hoeneß was not needed.
Uli Hoeneß countered Rummenigge and suggested that without his absence, Pep Guardiola and Matthias Sammer would still be at the club.
Rummenigge was also blamed for not preparing the right successors to ageing superstars Franck Ribéry and Arjen Robben.
Salihamidžić knows all the facts, and will act in the coming years as mediator between the two bosses of the club [sportbild]

Hoeness has become like Wilhelm Neudecker.

Lahm will soon be called upon to take an administrative role

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Hasan "knows" "all the facts"?

Plus: He wouldn't still be here and we don't need Pep Guardiola... We just need a decent coach... Rummenigge and Hoeness? Both aren't needed anymore if you ask me... Fresh air please: Lahm, Schweini, Kahn (and Robben soon...)

IsiahRashad wrote:Uli Hoeneß countered Rummenigge and suggested that without his absence, Pep Guardiola and Matthias Sammer would still be at the club.

On this particular point, didn't Uli say something recently about Salihamidzic being so much better than Sammer?

MUTU wrote:

IsiahRashad wrote:Uli Hoeneß countered Rummenigge and suggested that without his absence, Pep Guardiola and Matthias Sammer would still be at the club.

On this particular point, didn't Uli say something recently about Salihamidzic being so much better than Sammer?

Hey Uli

"Without my absence, Pep and Sammer would still be here"

....okay, go back to prison then pls

aterford wrote:"Without my absence, Pep and Sammer would still be here"

....okay, go back to prison then pls

aterford, you crossed a line there. Not acceptable here. I'm not liking the new Uli either but you took it way too far.

MUTU wrote:

aterford wrote:"Without my absence, Pep and Sammer would still be here"

....okay, go back to prison then pls

aterford, you crossed a line there. Not acceptable here. I'm not liking the new Uli either but you took it way too far.

he may have been radicalized while in !

MUTU wrote:

aterford wrote:"Without my absence, Pep and Sammer would still be here"

....okay, go back to prison then pls

aterford, you crossed a line there. Not acceptable here. I'm not liking the new Uli either but you took it way too far.

Wasn't it obvious he was joking?!

I missed Uli so much... <3

MUTU wrote:

aterford wrote:"Without my absence, Pep and Sammer would still be here"

....okay, go back to prison then pls

aterford, you crossed a line there. Not acceptable here. I'm not liking the new Uli either but you took it way too far.

It was just a joke....
Not sure how what I said was any more "way too far" than what half the users here post on a daily basis, but, okay, point noted.

I'm with #12. i think we need to move on from both Uli and KHR.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

aterford wrote:

MUTU wrote:

aterford wrote:"Without my absence, Pep and Sammer would still be here"

....okay, go back to prison then pls

aterford, you crossed a line there. Not acceptable here. I'm not liking the new Uli either but you took it way too far.

It was just a joke....
Not sure how what I said was any more "way too far" than what half the users here post on a daily basis, but, okay, point noted.

I had no doubt, but you need to understand that most of the readers here are not regular users; the vast majority, in fact, don't have a user account. Putting such a post, especially without the use of emoticons to tone it down, can be very misleading.

FCBayernMunchen wrote:I'm with #12. i think we need to move on from both Uli and KHR.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree but it won't be an easy transition unless it happens slowly.