ramsej84 wrote:In 2012 Pirlo should have been sent off for handling the ball while guarduing the post from a corner.
The game was just three minutes old.
Who remembers it?
Sent from my GT-S6802 using Tapatalk 2
MUTU wrote:ramsej84 wrote:In 2012 Pirlo should have been sent off for handling the ball while guarduing the post from a corner.
The game was just three minutes old.
Who remembers it?
Sent from my GT-S6802 using Tapatalk 2
I forgot it. 0:14 but you can't tell if he used his hands or not.
Unlike this... Frings vs USA, 2002:
MUTU wrote:
Unlike this... Frings vs USA, 2002:
RB624 wrote:MUTU wrote:
Unlike this... Frings vs USA, 2002:
The ball clearly played Frings' hand. It was not a handball. Tired of people saying it should've been called. His hand is down, and the ball hit his hand. No foul, no penalty.
MUTU wrote:RB624 wrote:MUTU wrote:
Unlike this... Frings vs USA, 2002:
The ball clearly played Frings' hand. It was not a handball. Tired of people saying it should've been called. His hand is down, and the ball hit his hand. No foul, no penalty.
A goalbound effort was blocked on the line with a hand that was away from the body. Irrespective of intent or not, it's a clear penalty.
FCBayernMunchen wrote:To be honest even a penalty is unfair in such a situation. It should be a goal awarded.
RB624 wrote:Goalbound has no relevance according to the laws of the game. The hand was away from the body, but it was already there (if I am remembering correctly). It did not move at all to meet the ball. The ball found it.
[Laws of the Game 2011, page 113]A player is sent off, however, if he prevents a goal or an obvious goalscoring opportunity by deliberately handling the ball. This punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberately handling the ball but from the unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal being scored.
quaazi wrote:Common sense referees, seeing that moment clearly, would always award a penalty (as a clear goal can't be awarded). "the ball finding it" is absolutely idiotic. If you actually read the laws of the game, you'll find that "goalbound" actually has a lot of relevance in sending a player off.[Laws of the Game 2011, page 113]A player is sent off, however, if he prevents a goal or an obvious goalscoring opportunity by deliberately handling the ball. This punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberately handling the ball but from the unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal being scored.
Obviously this is, under current rules, accompanied by a penalty kick as well.
quaazi wrote:Common sense referees, seeing that moment clearly, would always award a penalty (as a clear goal can't be awarded). "the ball finding it" is absolutely idiotic. If you actually read the laws of the game, you'll find that "goalbound" actually has a lot of relevance in sending a player off.[Laws of the Game 2011, page 113]A player is sent off, however, if he prevents a goal or an obvious goalscoring opportunity by deliberately handling the ball. This punishment arises not from the act of the player deliberately handling the ball but from the unacceptable and unfair intervention that prevented a goal being scored.
Obviously this is, under current rules, accompanied by a penalty kick as well.
MUTU wrote:RB624 wrote:Goalbound has no relevance according to the laws of the game. The hand was away from the body, but it was already there (if I am remembering correctly). It did not move at all to meet the ball. The ball found it.
The point is that had Frings not been with his hand hanging away from his body, it would have been a goal for USA. Awarding a penalty for the incident would be the least the ref could and should have done.
Return to German National Team
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests