FC Bayern Forum

ottackon wrote:

Achilles wrote:I disagree, Bayern will benefit in many ways with Coman's purchase it's a win-win.

a)Bayern buys Coman to become the starter winger in the future.
b)Bayern buys Coman, they loan him so he can mature and play regurarly.

worst case scenario, Bayern buys Coman and sells him at least 40m so Bayern gets a profit, financially is a win.
There is no logical reason for Bayern not to buy Coman either sporting-wise or financial wise, as I said is a win-win for the club.

Sane,Sterling,Martial,Renato,Stones all these "talents" cost more than 40m so will Coman who is a very hot and shiny name.

I don't think he can be sold for more than 25 or 30m, while he could still cost us 28m if we buy him this season.
And the most important thing for me, is that I doubt he'll one day become a WC player, he's been exposed this season but let's wait and see.

You're 100% right.

And don't forget Bayern doesn't know how to sell a player.

The biggest amount is Kroos for €30M ...

Coman wrote:And don't forget Bayern doesn't know how to sell a player.

True, Bayern would mess it up somehow and sell him for 15m in the end.

Coman wrote:And don't forget Bayern doesn't know how to sell a player.
The biggest amount is Kroos for €30M ...

Bayern indeed looks like an amateur when it comes to sell but not all sales are the same, when everybody knows that you haven't reached an aggreement with a player for a renewal and that particular player(Kroos) has only 1 year remaining the price drops significantly.
Take into consideration that Kroos status when he played for us wasn't like his current one at RM even we were questioned him a lot.

So Coman is another issue, if we sign him he will have at least 4 years remaining to his contract, you have the upper hand and everybody knows that EPL clubs will have an auction for this guy. I don't value Coman so high either but when it comes to U-21 wingers he is top three actually.

Nevertheless Coman worths the risk, if Bayern board decides to continue our football legacy based on wingers something that I'm strong in favor then Coman needs to be supported and not questioned game after game, Ribery,Reus or A.Sanchez at his age were a nobody for example. Regardless our opinion about him and what he may become the realistic alternatives are not better players than Coman. Our Robbery's successors must be established players, we have one in face of D.Costa the other one should be Sanchez. By 2019 that Robbery will be out of the picture we'll be more than ready having 3 wingers(Costa,Sanchez,Coman)

I don't think that he can be sold for more than 30m... most teams who can pay more than that don't have space for him anymore. Buy him for 28m to make a possible profit of 2m?

PunkCapitalist wrote:

JANCKER wrote:I don't think that he can be sold for more than 30m... most teams who can pay more than that don't have space for him anymore. Buy him for 28m to make a possible profit of 2m?

Don't get why suddenly no one rates Coman. He did fantastically last season. While he did benefit from Pep's simple system for wingers, he is 19; he had lots and lots of time to improve. There are no better wingers in his age-group and few are his equals.

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

I just said that we wouldn't be able to sell him for more than 30m... which team needs him? What team is going crazy after him?

30m is a lot... everything over is crazy.

PunkCapitalist wrote:Probably the whole premier league can pay more for him. Dude if Sané went for +45m, we surely can get *at very least* 30 for Coman......

Which of those teams need him there? Coman won't move to Stoke.

Swap Coman and Cash for Alexis.

Why the **** do we extend TWO - albeit merited - players so soon after they both together were unable to match the number of games we played?!?

Can't see tweet? Click here!

Alonso?