Here we have today's post-match survey for 3:2 vs Olympiacos. Post-match survey:
https://forms.gle/9y78XDcp21XXrbDq5Feel free to share if you please. More responses tends to paint a more accurate picture IMO.
Also, obviously I didn't get that "international break" edition out over the last break. But I am still compiling a few questions.
I've been toying with the idea of putting questions (or more accurately, statements) on what they call a Likert scale. It's commonly used in psychology and a lot of personality assessment type things (I'm trained as a psychologist, what can I say

) but I'm not sure if it'd work well in this application or not...
An example of a question/statement in this style would be something like: "I believe that our team is playing to the best of its abilities/potential" and then you'd respond on a scale of Strongly Disagree - Disagree - Neutral - Agree - Strongly Agree.
I think it's kind of interesting and provides a bit of nuance, but at the same time I'm not sure the best way to produce that result data (it'd be kind of tedious to have to compile five different percentages for every question, i.e. "25% said strongly disagree, 20% said strongly agree..." and so on), so I dunno. I thought about applying a "weighting" to the scale, wherein "strongly disagree" is worth 1 and "strongly agree" is worth 5 and then producing an "average" rating from that, but I don't know that that's really any better than the current format.
So, just some food for thought. Do you think that'd work well? Interesting change of pace, or not worth it? I won't be offended either way. I don't plan on using that for the "normal format" survey, just as something for these "state of the season" type things, but again - just an idea, no real commitment to it.