YlonenXabi wrote:I've always disliked VAR, but now I do it even more. With VAR it's easier to deliberately rob any team.
Whenever any team scores a goal VAR can just go back 30 seconds and try to see if there is any minimal thing that can cause it to be disallowed. Yesterday not even Courtois or Real players protested before VAR revised the goal
If they don't want to disallow the goal they can just ignore it and move on.
Another example is Asensio's goal. Just before he scored you have Vinicius pushing and running over an Ajax player. VAR could have easily disallowed the goal because of that foul, but they decided to conveniently ignore it.
ramsej84 wrote:Again ,... I think the VAR should go like this...
both coaches should ask the ref two times per match... that's all
YlonenXabi wrote:I've always disliked VAR, but now I do it even more. With VAR it's easier to deliberately rob any team.
Whenever any team scores a goal VAR can just go back 30 seconds and try to see if there is any minimal thing that can cause it to be disallowed. Yesterday not even Courtois or Real players protested before VAR revised the goal
If they don't want to disallow the goal they can just ignore it and move on.
Another example is Asensio's goal. Just before he scored you have Vinicius pushing and running over an Ajax player. VAR could have easily disallowed the goal because of that foul, but they decided to conveniently ignore it.
MUTU wrote:ramsej84 wrote:Again ,... I think the VAR should go like this...
both coaches should ask the ref two times per match... that's all
If we ever go down this path, I hope that if the request was warranted (i.e. decision overturned), the coach does not lose his count of remaining 'times'.
That is, there should be no limit to the number of times the referee can be challenged and you get proven correct. The limit should be there to stop it from being abused as a means of time wasting (which it would be in injury time).
ramsej84 wrote:MUTU wrote:ramsej84 wrote:Again ,... I think the VAR should go like this...
both coaches should ask the ref two times per match... that's all
If we ever go down this path, I hope that if the request was warranted (i.e. decision overturned), the coach does not lose his count of remaining 'times'.
That is, there should be no limit to the number of times the referee can be challenged and you get proven correct. The limit should be there to stop it from being abused as a means of time wasting (which it would be in injury time).
no just two ... if the ref decides against that would be it.
ramsej84 wrote:I agree with you but I don't know what to say...
I mean, if we keep halting the game that much it will become as boring as hell.
Last night it must have been a tough one for you right?Lukas wrote:The PL fanboys are against it because they think it will "spoil the most entertaining league in the world by stopping the action all the time"
ramsej84 wrote:Last night it must have been a tough one for you right?Lukas wrote:The PL fanboys are against it because they think it will "spoil the most entertaining league in the world by stopping the action all the time"
Seeing Spurs eating BVB alive and Leeds claiming back the top spot
I don't give a xitt about the others... as they don't give a xitt about us...Lukas wrote:ramsej84 wrote:Last night it must have been a tough one for you right?Lukas wrote:The PL fanboys are against it because they think it will "spoil the most entertaining league in the world by stopping the action all the time"
Seeing Spurs eating BVB alive and Leeds claiming back the top spot
Leeds are going up I've resigned myself to it since around October. The other one was difficult to take but it's about to get worse. PL 3 BL 0 at the end of this round
MUTU wrote:However, take Marcelo's handball against Bayern last season... there was no way VAR would not have given it.
Return to UEFA Champions League
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests