FC Bayern Forum

Lukas wrote:Offside in the build up any way but yeah Goretzka has had enough chances to prove himself and failed (not that I expected much from him anyway).

Disappointing today could not have complained if they had been able to finish their chances and won. Really don't know where this team is going right now every time we look like we might be getting somewhere we revert to shitness soon after.

What makes predictions so hard is that there is a dozen teams in the BuLI that cannot play football at all. Only outrageous amounts of luck make it possible to win against a top team. And as we saw, Leipzig is one of those.

After watching the season, the only team that COULD be better than Bayern seems to be Liverpool. But seeing how unbelievably lucky they were in three or four games to win 1:0, although the other team was better....

Here is the problem that I see with Bayern. This game was not the first one where the second half was a desaster compared to the first half. The proble is... Flick! He cannot improve the team for the second half. Remember Guardiola? Around the 55. or 60. minute he changed two, or if necessary three players.... and there basically was a totally different team playing and the tired opposition could no longer manage....

Flick must have seen that Gnabry and Müller were a waste... and brought Coman in the 85th?

Maybe it would have been better if Leipzig would have scored one of their three 100% chances.
At least a serious discussion could have been started. Instead, now there is Köln, Paderborn, Hoffenheim, Augsburg and Union coming....

aterford wrote:Overall I thought it was a pretty good tactical match. Nagelsmann is a top manager but I never felt like he "out-foxed" Flick today or anything. We were clearly the better team in the first half, but it felt like a lot of fatigue set in for much of the second half. Just a lot of players looking gassed.

On the whole I think both sides can reasonably feel a bit frustrated they didn't take three points.

Anyways here's the survey. Someday I will get more results posted...


https://forms.gle/YdfCpNrizzHQWBZo6

"...but it felt like a lot of fatigue set in for much of the second half."

It started after 25 minutes....

Müller, grinning, says: "When the game ends 0:0 it is almost obvious that not many goals were scored."

Can't see tweet? Click here!

Can't see tweet? Click here!

Can't see tweet? Click here!

Can't see tweet? Click here!

MoFattal wrote:Not a very good game. We had a good start to the game and were better in the first half, but the second was just bad on all fronts. The result is really fair, and we can live with a draw. A couple of points to be taken from this game:

- Upamecano is a beast. We have to try and sign him this summer.
- Nagelsmann is a top coach.
- Coutinho has no future here. The out-of-shape Gnabry had a lot more presence than him.
- Muller-Goretzka doesn’t work against decent defenses.

I disagree the second half was bad on all fronts. In my opinion it was a fairly balanced game most of the time, except the first 10-15 minutes when we were dominant, and another 10-15 minutes in the second half when they were. Flick made the right moves to regain control. In my opinion he passes with flying colours today against one of our potential options to replace him, even if we didn’t win.

We are a bit lucky we didn’t lose but then so are they. Neuer had a few blunders today.

Agree 100% with your list of points.

Firefox1234 wrote:

Can't see tweet? Click here!

Lol cry me a river

FCBayernMunchen wrote:
Lol cry me a river

Can't see tweet? Click here!

r10 wrote:Davies is very talented young guy, pity he plays for Canada (whom??) rather than France to benefit from national team.

I am intrigued by this statement: what's the connection between Davies and France?

Jorge wrote:

r10 wrote:Davies is very talented young guy, pity he plays for Canada (whom??) rather than France to benefit from national team.

I am intrigued by this statement: what's the connection between Davies and France?

There is no connection at all. With Ghana yes, with France...

Jorge wrote:what's the connection between Davies and France?

As an example .
You wouldn't say it's profitable for Bayern lad plays for Ghana or Gabon (whatever they achieve in Africa Cup), would you?

Fénix wrote:with France...

Don't say that in Quebeck .

r10 wrote:

Fénix wrote:with France...

Don't say that in Quebeck .

I am still lost here, he never lived in Quebec nor he speaks French. I do not see any connection between Davis and France, nor through Canada, nor through his birthplace, nor through the different qualities of national teams.

Jorge wrote:

r10 wrote:

Fénix wrote:with France...

Don't say that in Quebeck .

I am still lost here, he never lived in Quebec nor he speaks French. I do not see any connection between Davis and France, nor through Canada, nor through his birthplace, nor through the different qualities of national teams.

His point was that Bayern doesn't benefit from a Canadian NT player like they would from a French one.
Which is utterly stupid because the marketing potential of a north american superstar is enormous.

Especially if we do actually land Dest in the summer. Having two young North Americans in the squad would be huge for marketing