Unofficial FC Bayern Forum

i prefer Ganso to Neymar to be honest, more mature as well, Neymar is a bigtime whiner, never stops moaning and dives alot

at the end of the day , the club gets ganso or neymar (or hazard/lukaku) who wants them more- they have become very famous around the world for being super talents so all the top clubs know about them and probably consider them - finally the club who accepts to pay their unreasonably high pricetag will get them exactly like pato - and we all know bayern is not that kind of club

Psychaz wrote:i prefer Ganso to Neymar to be honest, more mature as well, Neymar is a bigtime whiner, never stops moaning and dives alot

Yeah , but that guy has mad skills


but Hazard Would be better than Both

he is more mature even though he is young , and also the French league is stronger and more RELIABLE than the Brazilian League , besides hazard Played against some good team in the EL


also Shaqiri Would be better , He is very good , very smart and we had to taste that by ourselves

And If A player can play GREAT vs Bayern , then he is Bayern Material no doubt

other than both are used to the culutre and climate , and German Language(Shaqiri speaks german , but Hazard is probably at least familiar)


Neymar and Ganso are good choices too but Hazard and Shaqiri are Better


Hazard is A LM , RM , CAM and Forward

Shaqiri is a LM , RM , LB and RB


So it depends if need a winger and defensive fullback

or an Offensive all-rounder

and From what i see , Shaqiri's position are needed more than Hazards

if you get a chance to sign someone like Ganso, you take it, he's a special talent, doesn't matter what you need at that moment, he is someone you can build around for years to come.

Psychaz wrote:if you get a chance to sign someone like Ganso, you take it, he's a special talent, doesn't matter what you need at that moment, he is someone you can build around for years to come.

cant the same be said about Shaqiri and Hazard

Hazard maybe, but i heard his attitude is not so good, Shaqiri, haven't seen much of him apart from against us and the goal against England

Element wrote:And If A player can play GREAT vs Bayern , then he is Bayern Material no doubt

haha this is not true

YlonenXabi wrote:

Element wrote:And If A player can play GREAT vs Bayern , then he is Bayern Material no doubt

haha this is not true

I'd agree with that. We've had signings like Schlaudraff or Hashemian in the past, who played well against us, but weren't Bayern material at the end of the day. Any given professional footballer can play above his level on a given day and return to his normal performances afterwards. It's about consistency.

Santos turned down an offer from Porto.
The bad thing of this guy is that he gets injured more often than Breno.

Greek Bavarian wrote:Santos turned down an offer from Porto.
The bad thing of this guy is that he gets injured more often than Breno.

Breno doesn't get injured too often. The problem with Breno is the injuries he suffered tended to be long term ones.

You are right on that.

Unless these guys like Ganso & Hazard put great performances in CHL against top teams they dont deserve to be at Bayern & not for a Massively Inflated 30 Million tag. Hell Robbery cost 25 Million each

Guys, we do not have to hope for South American signings anymore. Board just recently declared they are not going to sign '18 year old brazilians anymore'. All our previous signings from this continent have failed. Breno is obvious example. So probably we are re-framing our transfer policy strategy: if signing is going to be South American, then he must have experience in Europe.

Renamed the thread