FCBayernMunchen wrote:I don't have time to watch the video but if it makes them more accepting, bring on a corrupt world!
MUTU wrote:FCBayernMunchen wrote:This is literally just a change in name which is why I can't see why it has caused such an uproar (at least among online commenters).
Because they want to retain their superiority complex of their traditional marriage over the newly-available civil union. Otherwise, how else can they use religion as an excuse to preach exactly what their own religion forbids them to do: discriminating and hating because it's "unnatural", despite scientifical evidence pointing to a 'gay gene' which would thus make homosexuality natural?
ottackon wrote:That's bullcrap, because a quick search on the internet shows that a simple and singular determinant for homosexual orientation has not been conclusively demonstrated as various studies point to different, even conflicting positions.
Billy兄貴 wrote:Exposing children to anything remotely of that nature (sexual) is really disgusting.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests