I Have posted this
Element wrote:Bayern and 1860 munich are going to court again today
Uli hoeness Accused 1860 Munich of stealing money
Reason: Since July 2009 , 1860 Munich only paid to the Stadium Ltd. for catering what they are becoming from VIP's and Sponsors instead of the monthly rates of the Yearly 2 mio euros that was written in the deal .
The Lawyers of 1860 munich that they are not ready to pay the catering of the 3000 expensive business seats , beucase they never used more than the half of them
And also because they sold FC Bayern their Sharing of Allianz Areno for 11 mio euros on April 2006
The lawyers said : "Before Selling our share , Paying as A co-owner made sense , but now As Renter ,No"
1860 Munich wants to pay 1 mio euros yearly instead of 2 mio euros
Guess What Now ?
Uli Hoeness Announced that 1860 have not paid anything in the last 2 months (No Catering , And surprisingly No RENT of the Allianz Arena)
So The Stadium LTD, and FC Bayern have Sued 1860 for 500 Thousand Euros (The Catering)
About the Rent , FC Bayern Tried to contact 1860 Munich , but No one was Available (they are running away it seems)
and 1860 Munich rent the Allianz Arena for 20 thousand Per Game
With The Game Vs Union Berlin today
They Will have to pay us 120 thousand Euros
500K +120K= 620 Thousand Euros We want from them
After 1860 Munich Heard That
They Have Responded with this letter (The letter is long so here is the translation using Google NOT ME This time)
"To the guidance of the President of FC Bayern München e. V., Ulrich Hoeness, and the manager of the Allianz Arena Stadion GmbH (AAMSG), Peter Kerspe to the withheld by 1860 payments we make clear:
On 25 April, we have obtained detailed information on this subject, also a public position. It is crucial that we have already proposed at that time our landlord to transfer those payments to a neutral account to which the party has access, which win the case. This may be an unmistakable indication that we are willingness to pay, however for our legitimate and legally sound interests do not want to neglect and neglect within the meaning of our company not either. To date, the AAMSG this offer has not reacted. Meanwhile, no new facts have occurred. Therefore we can repeat here our factual description of essentially only:
Following the advice of our lawyers we have set the payments to the AAMSG to secure our claims arising from the pending litigation. The need to be seen in particular from the fact that the FCB has recently been stressed several times publicly that they want to end the lease in time. If this is indeed the case, the TEC would need 1860 in the case of process-profit worry, not to enforce claims promptly.
Incorrect is the view expressed in the press claim that 1860 would pay no rent for two months. The main fixed machine rental was paid in advance every six months. The next important Cash Rental in the amount of € 1.0 million is payable only in the new season.
Both the AAMSG and its partners have from the start every conversation categorically rejected our offer. Numerous written and verbal negotiation offers were ignored. The explicit reference by the court to renegotiate the lease again, was dismissed. In that regard, we have no other option than waiting for judicial clarification of the matter.
"We have tried not to take the dispute with our landlord in the public. Unfortunately, we are the remarks made by the landlord side repeatedly forced to, "says Stoffers. Finally, Stoffers said: "For four years we have paid amounts in millions of dollars without proper consideration. It's only natural that we are now trying to get with the legal means our money bac